Don’t eat of my heart, too many bites have already been taken
Don’t eat of my heart, too many bites have already been taken
Most stories that I have written in the bast have not been for online publication so I have not had the need for social media elements within those stories. That being said, I have gained the skills that would help me advertise my stories via social media.
Ann Arbor, Mich. – This Late-Winter and Spring in southern Michigan have been a Hodge-Podge of intertwining runs of warm days and nights and freezing days and nights. Weather like this makes for a interesting maple-sap, or sugarbush, harvesting season.
Ideal conditions for sugarbush are freezing nights followed by above freezing days. “We had one really good week,” said owner of H & H Sugarbush in Chelsea Michigan, Kirk Hedding. “Usually we count on four to five weeks of good weather.”
Hedding explained that because of the size and geography of Michigan harvest seasons very. “Southern Michigan’s season was short and three weeks early, Northern Michigan is having a really good season.” Hedding also explained that in the upper peninsula of Michigan there was a lot of freezing both night and day so their season is starting late.
These pictures were taken within the same week in mid-February. A time when maple sap generally does not run but ran this year for two weeks.
“We tapped a month early,” said Matthew at Whitney Farms. “We have records going back over 100 years and this is the earliest ever.”
The weather seemed only to affect the
Washtenaw Community College students, John Castro, 17 and Thomas Malley, 18, talk about what the best like about maple syrup and how they use it.
— The Walleye Magazine (@thewalleye) April 11, 2016
can restrict access, change conditions and terms- at any time.
can download/copy content and other downloadable items for personal use only
written permission needed from The New York Times Rights and permission office for other-than personal use reasons.
about posting on the site :
can not upload to, or distribute or otherwise publish on to the Services any libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.
no spam or verbal abuse, no hate speech or discrimination
Debate; don’t attack
No solicitation of funds or services or advertising; no commercial posts.
NYT basically owns the rights to anything that you comment
owns your content through third parties?
can delete any comment
if you wrote content in the publication than you can not review or comment on it or competing works
“does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information displayed, uploaded, or distributed through the Services by any user, information provider or any other person or entity. You acknowledge that any reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, memorandum, or information shall be at your sole risk. THE SERVICES AND ALL DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT USE OF THE SERVICES IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.”
Copywrite? Linking? Responsibilities for posting? Would these stand up in court?
Ann Arbor, Mich. – This Tuesday the big winners of each party are Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. This might have spelt disaster for the rest of the candidates, definitely for Senator Marco Rubio, who dropped out of the race.
— Esiban J.P (@Esiban) March 15, 2016
The big prize of the night – Florida
Tonight, Florida was the big state to win and the competition, however finite, was fought for hard.
The losses from this state may have defined the rest of the primary. This is especially true for Florida senator Marco Rubio. This loss forced Rubio from the race.
Although Rubio suffered a great loss, he made a surprisingly cheery post-speech.
“After tonight, it is clear that while we are on the right side of this year, we are not on the winning side,” said Rubio to supporters in his speech.
Florida is Rubio’s home state, so he should have been expected to win right? NPR wrote a story that argued how clear a possible Rubio win really is pre-poll results.
— NPR (@NPR) March 15, 2016
“Tonight is everything for Bernie Sanders,” says political activist and commentator, Van Jones on CNN.
Ohio was the one non-standard state
Senator John Kasich won his home state for the Republicans over the favored regular, Trump.
“It’s exactly what I expected,” said a conservative who voted for Ted Cruz in the Michigan primary, Bo Noles about Kasich’s win in Ohio. “Kasich hasn’t done anything to hurt himself but he also hasn’t done anything to help himself.
On the Democratic side Clinton held up the nights standard with a win.
“Ohio was worse than I feared with it being a closed primary,” said a Sanders supporter, Zack Criger, 26, on Sanders loss.
North Carolina, Illinois and Missouri
Clinton and Trump won for their parties in these three states.
For the democrats a Illinois and Missouri, the democratic votes were incredibly close. In Missouri Clinton won by .2 percent. And in Illinois, a state where Clinton grew up, she edged by by a 1.8 percent margin.
For the republican side Trump was a significant winner in all these states except Missouri where he won over Ted Cruz by a narrow .2 percent.
Other fun stuff
Here is a Facebook post by The Hill about what happened when trump won the Illinois primary.
Here is a discussion of data for the two democratic candidates prior to these primaries.
Michigan in 2015, is worth 123 Democratic delegates and 59 Republican delegates, making it a key state for candidate to win. It is also a state who’s primary comes at a key time in the primary process – the results in this state could sway the results in the rest of the primaries.
The big news – Democratic candidate, Bernie Sanders won the Michigan primary in an upset against front runner, Hillary Clinton with a 1.5 percent margin for the Democrats. Donald Trump Crushed his fellow Republican running-mates. He finishing ahead of Ted Cruz, the Texas senator and second place in the primary, by a whopping 11.6 percent.
Michigan Primary Results
Sanders upset of front-runner Clinton has meant a lot for Michigan voter who support Sanders.
— Anderson Cooper 360° (@AC360) March 9, 2016
“Absolutely Historic – largest upset we’ve seen in a generation,” said Zack Criger, 26, a political science graduate from Wayne State and resident of Ann Arbor who voted for Sanders. Criger attributes much of Sander’s success to the incorporation of people into his candidacy. Criger himself was part of a voluntary grassroots organization out of Ann Arbor who campaigned for Sander’s before there was enough money for paid campaigners.
Criger, who is in touch with U of M students, said that he was moved by how much people showed up to vote, particularly college students who were on break.
“I was really excited that Bernie won. I didn’t expect him to,” said Tierney Isaac, 20, a broadcast arts major who voted for Sanders.
Trump was widely expected to take the Michigan primary so it was no surprise that he won.
The most interesting part about the republican vote was how well John Kasich did in the state despite his being the least likely candidate to win.
“I don’t think they (Republicans) have an electable Candidate,” said Benjamin Demroy, 30, a voice acting and broadcast arts major who voted for Sanders.
The Primary Climate Leading up to the Michigan Primary
Republican Side –
Clinton is winning so far with 59 percent of pledged votes. Sanders follows with 41 percent of pledged votes.
Predictions based on polls leading up to the Michigan primary showed that Clinton and Trump should win.
Twitter is being lit up by pro-Sanders votes with little mention of Clinton.
— aaron bowersock (@abowersock) March 8, 2016
In other news
Sorry Trump, Canada is already building a wall:
SAN FRANCISCO – California has had a fantastic record braking year in wine exportation in 2015. This by itself is fantastic news especially when you consider the strength of the U.S. dollar.
The sales are outpacing volume growth and this growth is happening despite foreign competitors with high financial support, high export-taxes.
California Wine Export Record Stats
According to a press release from the Wine Institute, U.S. wine exports, 90 percent from California, hit a $1.61 billion revenue. That is an all-time record and a 7.6 percent increase in sales from 2014.
The Volume was up 461 million liters, contained in 51.2 million cases. That is a 4.1 percent increase from 2014.
Exports from California have increased 91 percent by value in the past decade.
Countries Buying the Wine
The top 10 export markets for California wines in 2015:
These statistics are according to the California Wine Institute.
Reasons for the Increase in Exportation
“California wines appeal to consumers across the globe who recognize the unique quality and excellent value of our wines. Consumers are also attracted to California’s trend-setting lifestyle, innovative cuisine, beautiful wine country destinations and emphasis on environmental responsibility – all of which are reflected in our wines,” said Wine Institute President and CEO Robert P. Koch.
This is an all-inclusive statement by Mr. Koch but there are also reasons for the increase country-by-country. Here is more about increases in other countries:
Comparative Wine Export Markets
To give you an idea of the wine export climate of the world, here is the top-ten wine exports of 2014. The dollar values are U.S. currency values and the percents are of total wine exports.
World-wide statistics of wine exports for 2015 are not yet available. These statistics are according to worldstopexports.com.
Despite the great records there is still room for growth and obstacle in the way.
“Removing obstacles to trade and ensuring that California wines have fair and equal access to international sales channels remain our top focus,” said Wine Institute Vice President and International Trade Counsel Tom LaFaille.”Unfortunately, more and more countries and provinces are “modernizing” their laws to benefit only local wine producers. Wine Institute works closely with the U.S. government to continue to lead initiatives against discriminatory trade barriers which violate international agreements.”